Quit Outsourcing for Good

OutsourcingOrganizations that have successfully created and maintain brand stature consistently are rare. There are many who keep trying to achieve these goals, but fail badly. According to a research carried by Bain & Co., there are hardly one in every ten organization that have achieved sustainable growth with profit. The outsourcing capability is one such quality, which places the winner apart.

Primarily, off-shoring and outsourcing started as a measure for cost-cutting, but organizations that establish sustained value consistently, utilize them for meeting better strategic ends, to achieve capabilities due to lack of in-house capabilities, and to strengthen existing abilities.

Almost 85% of market winners utilize outsourcing widely and strategically for various purpose, for instance, developing talents, introducing latest products, and to enable business model based on innovation. Basically, in other words, organizations have moved way beyond mere the aspect of cost-cutting.

Employee outsourcing has quite warmly been embraced by the organizations all over, especially for companies based on information and technology, however, it seems the effect is somehow on the verge of fading.

The time has changed and the tide has turned against the concept of outsourcing for IT. The only idea, which makes sense, is when organizations used to see technology as a price of doing business.

The first factor why outsourcing is being avoided is the segmentation of finance. Due to this idea, organizations need to create financial tracking at a sufficiently precise level in order to enable a future model of ‘tower by tower’ cost comparison. As an outsourced services’ buyer, the organization must include sufficient segmentation and granularity of its expense to compare the in-house deputies to the costs of outsourcing provider on the basis of service quality and normalization for the scope. The organization must maintain necessary visibility into every aspect of finances of its delivery solutions, which includes asset costs of software and hardware, tools for monitoring in place, and the amount that would be compulsorily required to compare against an in-house solution in future.

The organization must maintain necessary visibility into every aspect of finances of its delivery solutions, which includes asset costs of software and hardware, tools for monitoring in place, and the amount that would be compulsorily required to compare against an in-house solution in future.

The second factor is highly skilled employee retention in the organization. The strength of retained organization of a company, which is the staff and leaders who collectively operate strategic functions and handle provider of outsource, is a key authorizer for insourcing in potential future. Organizations are required to retain highly skilled staff with a precise understanding of processes, tools, and standards executed by the provider of outsource. In the event where insourcing is compulsory, such skilled resources are very significant in order to establish job requirements for setting up internal recruitment.

The worst possible scenario is to plan to insource a task and then fail to provide cost requirements or service quality. For such failures, the accountability will be very clear. One of the major decision gates behind the idea of insourcing must be commitment and capability of a company to provide tools, people, and processes required to perform the function, which is insourced with necessary proficiency, which was, certainly not achievable via outsourcing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*